<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Commercial Mediation &#38; Arbitration Center &#187; Reasonableness Under The United States Sentencing Guidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medart-al.org/tag/reasonableness-under-the-united-states-sentencing-guidelines/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medart-al.org</link>
	<description>Law &#38; Dispute Resolution Worldwide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:59:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reasonableness Under The United States Sentencing Guidelines</title>
		<link>http://www.medart-al.org/reasonableness-under-the-united-states-sentencing-guidelines.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.medart-al.org/reasonableness-under-the-united-states-sentencing-guidelines.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National, State, Local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonableness Under The United States Sentencing Guidelines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medart-al.org/reasonableness-under-the-united-states-sentencing-guidelines.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In recent years, several decisions by the United States Supreme Court have determined how federal courts now apply the federal guidelines at sentencing. The most notable is United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), where the Supreme Court transformed the federal sentencing guidelines from mandatory to advisory as a way of curing a defect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, several decisions by the United States Supreme Court have determined how federal courts now apply the federal guidelines at sentencing.  The most notable is  United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), where the Supreme Court transformed the federal sentencing guidelines from mandatory to advisory as a way of curing a defect t <a href="http://www.medart-al.org/reasonableness-under-the-united-states-sentencing-guidelines.html">Read more ...</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medart-al.org/reasonableness-under-the-united-states-sentencing-guidelines.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

